Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marylou Speelman's avatar

I have received a first class education from reading your information Terry. I thank you for your truth telling and appreciate your hard work. I do remember you telling me that one must attempt to look on the bright side as not everything is in ruin. Lately, I am not quite so sure. How the Liberals continue to get away with their behaviour and corruption is absolutely mind blowing. Knowing as we do, we must sit and watch them carry on as if everything is just fine, when their actions alone are enough to make one’s skin crawl. Their cover up is in plain sight for every Canadian to see, yet there nothing we can do to remove them. It’s treason and it is a crime punishable by law, yet they are allowed to continue governing this country. Canada truly is broken.

Expand full comment
George Hariton's avatar

This would be the same government -- including Prime Minister and Cabinet -- who was so alarmed about American interference in Canada, during the truckers' protests some sixteen months ago. When it's a fringe of poorly equipped private American citizens, it's time to panic. When it's Xhina's well-oiled machine, no big deal. After all, the Chinese interference only changed the results in a small number of ridings. It didn't change the overall outcome.

But if it changed the outcome in only one riding, that IS a big deal. It means that the voters of that riding have effectively been disenfranchised, and now have an MP that the majority of voters didn't want. I think that's a big deal.

And further, the claim that the Chinese interference wasn't important because it didn't change the results (or hardly). Does that mean that we abolish the category of attempted crimes? No more convictions for attempted murder -- after all the perpetrator didn't succeed.

One final comment. With the expansive definition of "confidential" that our government applies to all sorts of documents, how can that government ever be held accountable for anything? Surely there is a balance between "security" and "cabinet confidentiality" and other objectives, like transparency and openness. We do need a public inquiry. Only, my priority would not be an inquiry into Chinese interference. Rather, it would be an inquiry as to how we can design some sane principles for sorting out that which must be kept confidential/secret, and that which should be made public.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts